- Definition of Terms
- Conversion Tables
- White Papers
- Pressure Point #1 Pressure Measurement Types
- Pressure Point #2 Understanding Accuracy and Precision
- Pressure Point #3 Linearity Measurements for MEMS Pressure Sensors
- Pressure Point #4 Dual Die Compensation for MEMS Pressure Sensors
- Pressure Point #5 Special Considerations for Mounting and Handling Pressure Sensors
- Pressure Point #6: Position Sensitivity in Pressure Sensors
- Pressure Point #7: Understanding Common-Mode Differential Pressure
- Pressure Point #8: Bandwidth vs. Signal to Noise Tradeoff
- Pressure Point #9: Pressure Sensor Technologies
- Pressure Point #10: Media Capability
- Pressure Point #11: Calculating Flow Rate from Pressure Measurements
- Warm Up Drift
- Design Considerations
- Technical Discussions
- Evaluation Kit
- Sensor History
- Product Catalogs PDF
- Technical Assistance
- Join Our Newsletter
- Sample Request
Warm Up Drift
How to minimize warm-up drift in pressure sensors
Director New Products
All Sensors Corp.
Morgan Hill, Calif.
Edited by Leslie Gordon, Medical Design
Warm-up drift in pressure sensors makes their readings vary until systems reach operating temperature. It’s usually of little concern. However, such drift is unacceptable in hospital respirators, spirometry equipment, neonatal monitors, and similar devices requiring high accuracy at all times. Examining a basic piezoresistive pressure sensor helps to understand the effect of warm-up drift.
The sensor is made of a body, or "die," and a thin silicon diaphragm with four piezoresistors on the surface. The piezoresistors change resistance in response to stress. They are generally arranged in a bridge configuration and are precisely located on the diaphragm surface to maximize the response to diaphragm deflection. This in turn maximizes the response to a pressure differential across the diaphragm.
Thus, reducing the excitation voltage by a factor of two reduces the sensing element temperature rise by a factor or four and, consequently, the warm-up surface condition is reduced by a factor of four. Since the signal level of the sensor is also reduced by a factor of two (with the reduced supply voltage), the overall effect is a reduction in surface contribution warm-up error by a factor of two. However, reducing the sensor power supply adversely affects the system electronic noise level.
An alternate and preferred approach to reducing supply voltage modulates the sensor supply as required by the system bandwidth. In other words, apply power to the sensor only when needed. This reduces power to the sensor to the time average (duty-cycle) applied and, hence, reduces warm-up drift. The method is slightly more sophisticated but can provide excellent results and without affecting system noise level.
Here the period, p, between power pulses for an application is the time the power is off plus the time the power is on. This is the time required to have all signals stabilize and the sensor to take a reading.
For example, consider a device that requires readings every 500 ms, has a settling time of 4 ms, and has a signal-acquisition time of 1 ms. The average power to the sensor is only about 1% ([1 ms + 4 ms]/500 ms) of the power applied as compared to a non-modulated system.
Of course, the period depends on an application's sampling requirements. It's important that p and on time t remain constant because of subtle surface charges. However, this is a minor constraint considering the benefits of modulating the sensor supply.
Minimizing this effect is accomplished by using the sensor resistance (bridge resistance-change with temperature) as the temperature-sensing element. Here the pressure-sensor bridge replaces what would normally be a thermistor (a type of resistor used to measure temperature changes) in a circuit that effectively becomes a Wheatstone bridge.
The sensor bridge has a high positive temperature coefficient of resistance (TCR) so an increase in temperature causes an increasingly negative charge in the signal output voltage (Vt) of the temperature-monitoring portion of the circuit. The change in Vt relative to the reference voltage (Vref) is an effective measurement of the sensor temperature itself. The system electronics uses this measurement as the calibration-temperature reference for the pressure sensor. This eliminates the perceived warm-up drift because an external temperature sensor is not involved, so there is no thermal gradient. The good news is that modulating supply and temperature-compensation methods can be used together to almost eliminate the effect of warm-up drift.